Siddaramaiah’s poll affidavits show mismatch as 3-acre land under scanner: Report – Hindustan Times

The affidavits filed by Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah over the past three meeting elections revealed inconsistencies in belongings relating to a 3.16-acre agricultural land parcel in Mysore gifted to his spouse, B M Parvati Siddaramaiah, 14 years in the past, in line with The Indian Categorical.

This land, which was gifted to her in 2010 by her brother, has turn into the main focus of a political controversy. The BJP has deliberate protests in Mysore, Siddaramaiah’s house district, on July 12, questioning the land’s 2021 switch to the state in change for 14 housing plots developed by the Mysore City Improvement Authority (MUDA) underneath a controversial “50:50” alternate website scheme.

Learn: Amid MUDA ‘rip-off’, Karnataka govt transfers Mysuru Deputy Commissioner

A comparability of affidavits submitted by Siddaramaiah for the Meeting polls in 2013, 2018, and 2023 with public land data confirmed discrepancies relating to the three.16-acre agricultural land underneath survey quantity 464 in Kesare village of Kasaba Hobli, reported The Indian Categorical.

The 2013 affidavit, filed three years after the land was gifted, didn’t point out possession by Siddaramaiah’s spouse, regardless of land data exhibiting a mutation report created on October 20, 2010, for a present deed from B M Mallikarjunaswamy to his sister B M Parvati, in line with the report.

In 2018, Siddaramaiah’s affidavit acknowledged his spouse’s possession of the land, valued at ₹25 lakh, noting it was a present from her brother in 2010. By 2023, the affidavit detailed the allotment of 37,190.09 sq ft of land by MUDA in change for the Kesare village land, valued at ₹8.33 crore.

Learn: Karnataka BJP to carry large protests in Mysore towards Siddaramaiah govt in alleged MUDA rip-off

These inconsistencies are central to a grievance by activist T J Abraham, alleging Siddaramaiah filed a “false affidavit” in 2013.

On Thursday, Siddaramaiah alleged that he was unnecessarily being focused within the case, claiming {that a} conspiracy is being hatched towards him out of heartburn as he belongs to a backward class neighborhood and has turn into the chief minister for a second time.

Noting that in 2014, the MUDA, regardless of the three.16 acres of his spouse’s land not belonging to it, made websites on it and allotted them to folks, Siddaramaiah mentioned, “what ought to we do? Ought to we preserve quiet? Alternate websites had been sought by us, however we didn’t search them in any particular locality — Vijayanagara.”

“If MUDA dedicated the incorrect when BJP was in energy, how can Siddaramaiah be answerable for it?” he questioned.

As per the land acquisition act, his household is entitled to compensation from MUDA for taking on the land, Siddaramaiah mentioned. “MUDA should pay ₹62 crore (as compensation). Allow them to take again the alternate websites allotted. We had not requested for it in Vijayanagar…it was accomplished whereas BJP was in energy,” he mentioned.

To a query about activist T J Abraham submitting a grievance with the Election Fee towards him alleging that he had didn’t disclose his spouse Parvathi’s possession of three acres and 16 guntas land in his election affidavit, Siddaramaiah mentioned, “If the Election Fee offers discover, I’ll reply to it. Will give no matter reply must be given in accordance with legislation.”